Sarp Agabigun vs Viacheslav Yulik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 03:45 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Agabigun vs V. Yulik

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Agabigun 1 - 0 Yulik
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sarp Agabigun winning 2 and Viacheslav Yulik winning 0. The last match between Sarp Agabigun and Viacheslav Yulik was at the M15 Kayseri, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Sarp Agabigun getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Agabigun | 1 |
| Yulik | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Kayseri(05-28-25)
S. Agabigun vs V. Yulik H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 41.82% (156-217) | Career Total W/L | 45.00% (36-44) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Agabigun vs V. Yulik Match Preview:
- On second serves, Yulik outperforms Agabigun by winning 45.71% of points, compared to Agabigun's 42.62%.
- When considering return games, Yulik leads by a significant margin, claiming 54.84% of points against the opponent's second serve, surpassing Agabigun's 41.28%.
- Can saving breakpoints influence a tennis outcome? Yulik is more successful here, saving 50% of breakpoints, whereas Agabigun manages 40%.
- Throughout the last year, Yulik's match win rate is higher at 62.5%, while Agabigun's is 47.06%.
- Considering surface preferences, Agabigun performs best on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate, whereas Yulik's strongest surface is hard courts with a 53% win rate.
- In terms of competitive level, Yulik has been more successful in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, winning 62.5% of such matches compared to Agabigun's 50%.
- Yulik has competed against tougher opponents, averaging an opponent rank of 109.5, while Agabigun's opponents average a rank of 432.94.
- In matches reaching a deciding set, Yulik has a slight edge, with a 50% win rate over the last year compared to Agabigun's 40%.
- Is breakpoint conversion pivotal in tight games? Yulik has a superior conversion rate of 46.15%, while Agabigun converts 29.41% of their opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
In this matchup, Yulik exhibits a distinct advantage based on recent performance metrics.
Yulik's edge in second serve return points and breakpoint conversion indicates a potential to control pivotal moments in the match.
Moreover, the ability to perform under pressure by saving a higher percentage of breakpoints and maintaining a better win rate against stronger opponents gives Yulik an additional edge.
Based on these comparative statistics, Yulik is favored to emerge as the likely winner in the upcoming tennis match against Agabigun.
Sarp Agabigun vs Viacheslav Yulik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Agabigun vs V. Yulik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:7:55 | Average Match Time | 1:7:55 |
| 71% (36/51) | 1st Serve % | 66% (33/50) |
| 83% (30/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (19/33) |
| 60% (9/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (10/17) |
| 50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 42% (21/50) | Return Points Win % | 24% (12/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Agabigun Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-0 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-7(8) 6-2 10-7 | ||
V. Yulik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-5 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 1-6 6-4 10-8 | ||
Q2 | W | 7-6(4) 6-4 | ||

S. Agabigun vs V. Yulik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.82% (156/217) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.00% (36/44) |
| 43.27% (363/476) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.71% (80/95) |
| 46.51% (3558/4092) | Games Win/Loss | 48.68% (755/796) |
| 46.23% (92/107) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 35.33% (53/97) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.83% (26/32) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 591 | Aces Total | 33 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 654 | Total Double Faults | 77 |
| 1:5:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 462.22 | Average Opponent Rank | 308.56 |
| 60% (10118/16999) | 1st Serve % | 69% (1036/1503) |
| 63% (6325/10118) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (641/1036) |
| 46% (3136/6881) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (201/467) |
| 40% (649/1618) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (81/184) |
| 39% (6424/16627) | Return Points Win % | 42% (695/1673) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 15.38% (4/22) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.41% (151/189) | Futures W/L | 45.00% (36/44) |
| 41% (150/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (36/80) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (45/84) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (9/18) |
| 44% (44/99) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (7/15) |
| 80% (173/138) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (35/31) |
| 20% (173/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (35/4) |
| 9% (200/18) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (45/5) |